Post by account_disabled on Mar 6, 2024 8:35:38 GMT 1
Academician Artan Fuga, through a post on social networks, has once again returned to the anti-defamation package, for which a delegation from the Venice Commission has also come to Tirana. Fuga writes that the law in question is not only culturally and professionally unworthy, but also contradicts not only the freedom of expression, but there are other, sharper, completely different problems that have not been decided apparently. "The law calls the damage to the reputation by going to the AMA or the Appeals Council as an administrative offense. In fact, this harms civil rights because the criminal code considers defamation, etc., as misdemeanors, criminal offenses. Now the court for these cases can tell the citizen to go to Ama!!! The judgment is made not by the courts.
The law in question states that measures Cambodia Telegram Number Data can be taken by either the AMA board or the Appeals Council and does not clearly define which. This creates a confusing legal and administrative mess. The administrative court has the right to judge whether the decision of the AMA is administratively fair or not, but it has no right to judge the case itself on the basis of defamation. Read also: Venice entrance fee, here are all the dates you'll need to pay to visit Bad weather in Italy, floods Venice and Milan In the Court, the individual goes to present himself before the jury, while in the AMA the operator is not expected to go. There isn't even a lawyer like in court, there isn't even a possibility for three levels of trial.
In a word, it turns into village judgement, the type of the democratic front", writes Fuga. Nga Artan Fuga There is room to clarify what the amended law on audiovisual and electronic broadcasting contains, and why it is not only culturally and professionally unworthy, but also contradicts not only the freedom of expression, but has other more acute problems , completely different, which have not been set in sight. Publications and measures against anticipated violations are treated differently, i.e. differently for print media, differently for linear audiovisual broadcasts, i.e.
The law in question states that measures Cambodia Telegram Number Data can be taken by either the AMA board or the Appeals Council and does not clearly define which. This creates a confusing legal and administrative mess. The administrative court has the right to judge whether the decision of the AMA is administratively fair or not, but it has no right to judge the case itself on the basis of defamation. Read also: Venice entrance fee, here are all the dates you'll need to pay to visit Bad weather in Italy, floods Venice and Milan In the Court, the individual goes to present himself before the jury, while in the AMA the operator is not expected to go. There isn't even a lawyer like in court, there isn't even a possibility for three levels of trial.
In a word, it turns into village judgement, the type of the democratic front", writes Fuga. Nga Artan Fuga There is room to clarify what the amended law on audiovisual and electronic broadcasting contains, and why it is not only culturally and professionally unworthy, but also contradicts not only the freedom of expression, but has other more acute problems , completely different, which have not been set in sight. Publications and measures against anticipated violations are treated differently, i.e. differently for print media, differently for linear audiovisual broadcasts, i.e.